Apache HTTP Server 2.2.16 x86 and x64 Windows Installers
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.16 was released day before yesterday that is 25th July 2010. And here are the 32 and 64 bit Windows binaries that I compiled. They have been compiled with Visual C++ 2008 (VC9) and contain the latest versions of openssl (1.0.0a) and zlib (1.2.5).
As before, the installers and binaries are digitally signed. The signatures should appear valid if you are using Windows 7 or 2008 or your Windows is up to date.
Download
apache_2.2.16-x64-openssl-1.0.0a.msi
CRC32: 0AA0250D
MD5: C6F2B24AFE22649C762FC7005DB4243E
SHA1: 89C807E1D3ACE1F8D9DA2878E5B871FD72CCD689
CRC32: 774D542B
MD5: 1E95819C9EB1E0C0BDBD2BA4BBEBF477
SHA1: DC862A19DE043BC97A2FEC19DD1BE1A8166931CC
CRC32: 5660CDAE
MD5: B1B4895EB8F68BCFF90201A86AF76D37
SHA1: EAABA10BAEA84764DB8AB90D7A24C39C96F49B34
apache_2.2.16-x86-openssl-1.0.0a.msi
CRC32: A39E5CCC
MD5: 4596D1C86ACC046B912F0C6C873C7B0B
SHA1: C93730728F785FF06DAC5293745A937585B43E4A
Next Post: PHP 5.3.3 x64 (64 Bit) for Windows
Previous Post: PHP 5.3.2 x64 (64 Bit) Windows Binary
Aug 3, 2010 at 2:15 PM
Thanks for creating these builds so fast!
A couple of questions:
1. apache_2.2.16-x64-openssl-1.0.0a.msi is about 500K smaller than apache_2.2.15-x64-openssl-0.9.8m.msi … any idea why?
2. Also, I’m curious why you used open ssl version 1.0.0a instead of 0.9.8o like the official release is bundled with?
Aug 3, 2010 at 7:00 PM
You are welcome.
And here are the answers to your questions.
1. Its a different build so file sizes may be different this time. Also I noticed that the “manual” directory was smaller this time. Previously the “manual” directory was about 17.7MB but now it’s only about 10.5MB. That may be because I used the unix source to compile this time since the win32 source wasn’t released yet.
2. When I checked the OpenSSL download page I saw that 1.0.0a was marked as “LATEST” and so thats what I used. The official Apache.org binaries were released after I posted these, so I didn’t know that they were gonna use 0.9.8o. I have no idea why they are not using version 1.0.0 and still sticking with 0.9.8.
Aug 9, 2010 at 1:51 AM
You rock Anindya!